Supreme Court Questions Bihar Voter List Revision Timing

In a significant development, the Supreme Court of India, on Thursday, July 10, 2025, raised tough questions about the Election Commission of India’s (ECI) Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in Bihar. The court, led by Justices Sudhanshu Dhulia and Joymalya Bagchi, asked why the ECI linked the revision to the upcoming Bihar assembly elections, set for October-November 2025. The bench also questioned the exclusion of Aadhaar cards as valid proof, sparking a heated debate about voter rights.

The ECI’s decision has stirred controversy, with opposition parties and activists crying foul. They claim the SIR could strip voting rights from millions. For instance, nearly 7.9 crore voters in Bihar must now submit documents proving their citizenship. Critics, including Congress, RJD, and TMC, call this move “arbitrary” and “unconstitutional.” However, the ECI defends the exercise, saying it’s a routine cleanup mandated by the Constitution.

Table of Contents

Why the Timing Matters

The Supreme Court pressed the ECI on why the SIR began so close to the elections. “Why can’t it be done irrespective of elections?” the bench asked. They noted that if the goal is to verify citizenship, the ECI should have acted earlier. Starting the process in June 2025, just months before the polls, seems rushed. Moreover, the court raised concerns about Aadhaar’s exclusion, as it’s a widely used ID for many Indians.

Senior advocate Rakesh Dwivedi, representing the ECI, argued that Article 326 of the Constitution requires only citizens to vote. He stressed that the SIR ensures a clean voter list. Additionally, the ECI pointed out that a similar exercise happened in 2003 without much fuss. Yet, opposition leaders like Mahua Moitra and Yogendra Yadav argue that asking 4 crore voters to re-verify their eligibility is unfair and risks disenfranchising many.

Opposition’s Stand

The opposition’s outrage is clear. For example, RJD leader Tejashwi Yadav accused the ECI of acting like a “political wing.” He claimed the revision targets specific communities, potentially silencing their voices. Similarly, activist Jagdeep Chhokar from the Association for Democratic Reforms (ADR) warned that half of Bihar’s voters could lose their rights. In fact, protests erupted across Bihar, with RJD and Congress calling for a bandh on July 9, 2025.

On the other hand, the ECI insists the SIR is standard procedure. Senior advocates KK Venugopal and Maninder Singh backed the ECI, emphasizing the need for a lawful voter list. They argued that duplicate or false entries must be removed to ensure fair elections. Still, the opposition fears the process could exclude genuine voters, especially those without proper documents.

RUSSIA REMOVE TALIBAN FROM TERRORIST LIST

US Warns of China’s Taiwan Threat at Singapore Summit

The SIR has sparked worry among Bihar’s voters. Many feel burdened by the need to prove their citizenship again. For instance, voters born after 1987 must submit documents showing their parents’ birthplace. This rule has caused confusion, as not everyone has access to such records. Furthermore, the exclusion of Aadhaar as proof has left many puzzled, given its widespread use.

BRICS Defies Trump’s 10% Tariff Threat: “No Emperor Needed

Social media platforms like Quora and Reddit show growing public concern. Users on Quora ask, “Why is Aadhaar not valid for voter verification?” Others on Reddit call the SIR a “backdoor NRC,” echoing sentiments from X posts. These discussions highlight fears of voter suppression, especially among marginalized groups. To learn more about voter rights and election processes, visit AMERICA NEWS WORLD for detailed insights.

Data on Bihar’s Electoral Roll

To understand the scale, here’s a look at Bihar’s voter numbers:

Category	Number
Total Voters	7.9 crore
Voters Requiring Verification	~4 crore
Documents Needed	Birth, Parentage Proof
Last SIR Conducted	2003

This chart, viewable on mobile and desktop, shows the massive scope of the SIR. Nearly half of Bihar’s voters face re-verification, raising logistical concerns. The ECI’s delay in starting the process has only fueled doubts about its feasibility.

The Supreme Court’s hearing continues, with a decision expected soon. If the SIR proceeds, it could reshape Bihar’s electoral landscape. However, if the court finds flaws, the ECI may need to rethink its approach. Meanwhile, opposition parties plan more protests, fearing the revision could tilt the elections.

For global readers, this issue highlights the challenges of balancing electoral integrity with voter access. In the U.S., similar debates over voter ID laws have sparked controversy. To explore more on global election trends, check AMERICA NEWS WORLD. For additional context, read this Times of India report on the Bihar voter list row.

This issue affects all age groups, from young voters to seniors, as everyone values their right to vote. By keeping the process transparent, the ECI can rebuild trust. For now, the Supreme Court’s final ruling will be crucial.