Big news for India! india brought Tahawwur rana who was accused of 26/11 attack in mumbai

Pakistan denies ties to Tahawwur Rana, 26/11 plotter extradited to India, labeling him Canadian. Read the full story at AMERICA NEWS WORLD.
Pakistan distances itself from Tahawwur Rana

1. Pakistan Shocks World, Disowns 26/11 Plotter Tahawwur Rana as Canadian
2. ISI Agent or Canadian? Pakistan’s Bold Move on Tahawwur Rana Revealed
3. Mumbai Attacks Mastermind: Why Pakistan Calls Rana a Foreigner Now
4. Tahawwur Rana Extradition: Pakistan’s Denial Sparks Global Debate
5. From ISI to Canadian: Pakistan’s Stunning Claim on Rana Unraveled

On April 10, 2025, Pakistan made a surprising move. Hours before Tahawwur Rana, a key figure in the 2008 Mumbai terror attacks, landed in India after extradition from the US, Pakistan’s government declared he was no longer one of their own. Instead, they called him a Canadian national. This statement has raised eyebrows globally. Why is Pakistan distancing itself from someone long linked to its Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI)? At AMERICA NEWS WORLD, we dive deep into this unfolding story, breaking it down for readers across the USA, India, and beyond.

This news matters because Rana’s role in the Mumbai attacks, which killed 166 people, shook the world. Now, as he faces trial in India, Pakistan’s denial adds a new twist. So, let’s unpack what happened, why it’s significant, and what it means for global security. We’ll keep it simple, clear, and engaging for everyone—whether you’re a teenager curious about world events or a retiree following the headlines.

Pakistan’s Foreign Office spokesperson, Shafqat Ali Khan, spoke at a press briefing on April 10, 2025. He said, “Tahawwur Rana is a Canadian national. He hasn’t renewed his Pakistani documents in over 20 years.” This came just as Rana, a 64-year-old accused of helping plan the 26/11 Mumbai attacks, was about to arrive in New Delhi. The National Investigation Agency (NIA) arrested him right after his plane landed.

But why the sudden denial? For years, Indian agencies, with help from the FBI, pointed to Rana’s ties with Pakistan’s ISI. Ajmal Kasab, the only Mumbai attacker caught alive, confessed to ISI’s involvement. Yet, Pakistan now claims Rana is just a Canadian citizen with no connection to them. This move has sparked debates about whether Pakistan is dodging responsibility or if there’s more to the story.

Let’s break it down. Tahawwur Rana was born in Pakistan in 1961. He served as a doctor in the Pakistan Army Medical Corps. In the 1990s, he moved to Canada and became a citizen. Later, he settled in Chicago, running an immigration business. But that’s not all. Indian and US investigators say Rana was a key player in the 2008 Mumbai attacks. He allegedly worked with David Coleman Headley, another conspirator, to scout targets like the Taj Mahal Palace Hotel.

Rana’s ties to Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT), a Pakistan-based terror group, are well-documented. Emails between him, Headley, and Pakistani officials suggest he helped fund and plan the attacks. The FBI arrested him in 2009, and after years of legal battles, the US extradited him to India in 2025. Now, Pakistan says he’s not their problem. But is it that simple?

Pakistan’s statement isn’t just words—it’s a strategy. Here’s why it’s a big deal:

1. Avoiding Blame: The Mumbai attacks put Pakistan under global scrutiny. By calling Rana Canadian, Pakistan hopes to shift focus away from its alleged role in supporting terrorism.
2. Protecting ISI: Indian agencies have long claimed ISI backed the attacks. Rana’s interrogation could reveal more about this link, which Pakistan wants to avoid.
3. Diplomatic Play: With India and the US working together to bring Rana to justice, Pakistan’s denial might be a way to ease tensions with both nations.

However, this isn’t new. Pakistan initially denied Ajmal Kasab was Pakistani, even claiming he was Indian. Forged IDs and fake aliases were part of the cover-up. When evidence proved Kasab’s origins, Pakistan faced embarrassment. Is history repeating itself with Rana?

To understand the stakes, let’s revisit the 2008 Mumbai attacks. On November 26, 2008, 10 terrorists from Lashkar-e-Taiba attacked Mumbai, India’s financial hub.

• Taj Mahal Palace Hotel
• Oberoi Trident Hotel
• Chhatrapati Shivaji Terminus
• Nariman House
• Other public spots

For three days, the city was under siege. The attackers killed 166 people, including foreigners from the US, UK, and Israel. Over 230 were injured. The world watched in horror as India fought back. Ajmal Kasab’s capture and confession exposed the plot’s roots in Pakistan, but justice has been slow.

Rana’s extradition is a step forward. His trial could uncover new details about the attack’s planning and Pakistan’s role. That’s why Pakistan’s denial feels like a preemptive strike.

Let’s look at some numbers to put things in perspective. Below is a table summarizing key facts about the Mumbai attacks and Rana’s case:

This graph, optimized for both mobile and desktop, shows how long it took to bring Rana to India. The 15-year gap highlights the legal and diplomatic hurdles. For readers in India and the USA, this visual makes the story relatable and easy to grasp.

The world is watching. Here’s how key players are responding:

• India: The NIA calls Rana’s extradition a “big win” for justice. They plan to grill him on ISI’s role.
• USA: The US State Department says it’s committed to fighting global terrorism with India.
• Pakistan: By denying Rana’s ties, Pakistan avoids direct confrontation but risks looking evasive.
• Others: Israel, whose citizens died in the attacks, welcomed the extradition.

These reactions show the case’s global impact. For readers in Europe, Africa, or Australia, it’s a reminder of how terrorism connects us all. At AMERICA NEWS WORLD, we aim to keep you informed, no matter where you are.

Rana is now in NIA custody in Delhi. He’ll likely face trial in Mumbai, where the attacks happened. The NIA wants 18 days to question him. They have emails and other evidence linking him to Headley and LeT. If convicted, Rana could face life in prison or worse.

But there’s more. Investigators hope Rana’s interrogation will expose Pakistan’s state actors—maybe even ISI officials. This could change how the world sees Pakistan’s role in terrorism. For young readers, think of it like a real-life crime drama unfolding. For older audiences, it’s a chance to see justice after years of waiting.

This news hits home for many. In India, the Mumbai attacks left scars that haven’t healed. Families lost loved ones, and survivors still carry trauma. In the USA, where Rana lived, it’s a reminder of how terror networks operate globally. For readers worldwide, it’s about safety, justice, and truth.

We’ve kept the language simple so everyone can follow. Words like “denial,” “justice,” and “terrorism” carry emotional weight, but they’re clear. Transition words like “however,” “meanwhile,” and “therefore” guide you smoothly through the story. Our goal? Make you feel informed and connected.

External Link for Context

For more on the Mumbai attacks, check out BBC News. They’ve covered the event’s impact in detail, offering a global perspective that complements our reporting at AMERICA NEWS WORLD.